Which of the following actions is part of the nature of the judicial process for a case to be decided?

The judicial process involves interpreting and applying existing laws, which is fundamental for making decisions in legal cases. When a case is brought before the court, judges rely heavily on statutes and legal precedents set by prior rulings. This practice ensures consistency and reliability in the legal system, as courts look to established laws and previous court decisions to guide their interpretations and rulings.

Using existing statutes and precedents allows the judiciary to maintain a balance between upholding the law and addressing the specifics of each case while ensuring that similar cases are treated similarly. This reliance on established legal frameworks provides stability in the law, aids in predicting legal outcomes, and helps ensure that justice is fairly administered.

The other options involve actions that do not align with the standard judicial process. For instance, creating new laws is typically a legislative function rather than a judicial one. Disregarding statutes, even if deemed unconstitutional, involves complex judicial interpretations rather than straightforward application of existing laws. Additionally, forcing legislative changes is outside the purview of the judiciary, representing a separation of powers essential to government functioning. Thus, the correct answer reflects the established practice of using precedents and statutes as foundational elements of judicial decision-making.