Which type of jurisprudence is based on universal moral principles?

The concept of Natural Law is rooted in the belief that there are inherent moral principles that govern human behavior, which exist independently of human-made laws. This school of thought posits that true justice and ethical standards are based on universal truths that transcend specific legal systems and cultural contexts. Adherents of Natural Law argue that these moral principles should inform and guide the creation of laws and legal institutions.

For instance, concepts such as human rights, justice, and equality are often derived from Natural Law philosophy, suggesting that certain rights are universally applicable to all individuals, regardless of societal norms or specific legal frameworks. This contrasts with other types of jurisprudence, such as Positive Law, which focuses on laws enacted by governments without reference to moral considerations, or Common Law, which develops through judicial decisions and precedent rather than universal ethical principles. Administrative Law pertains to regulations created by governmental agencies and does not fundamentally engage with the philosophical aspects of morality.

Therefore, the identification of Natural Law in this context highlights its emphasis on moral authority as the basis for legal systems, reflecting a broader and more philosophical understanding of law compared to the more procedural or statutory focuses of the other types mentioned.